Seems as if that was rather a non-answer. Well, it was a non-answer. He didn't answer her at all. How absurd. If he really believes as he says, he has thought about this question & his puny rebuttal.
Evidently, he is not comfortable with "what if he is wrong".
I've heard Dawkins and others use the same reasoning many times. They list many of the gods of different peoples throughout history, thinking that if those gods are false, then all gods are false. The assumption is based on all gods being created by people, instead of a God that created all people.
Seems as if that was rather a non-answer. Well, it was a non-answer. He didn't answer her at all. How absurd. If he really believes as he says, he has thought about this question & his puny rebuttal.
ReplyDeleteEvidently, he is not comfortable with "what if he is wrong".
I've heard Dawkins and others use the same reasoning many times. They list many of the gods of different peoples throughout history, thinking that if those gods are false, then all gods are false.
ReplyDeleteThe assumption is based on all gods being created by people, instead of a God that created all people.